Israel and Lebanon have agreed to implement a conditional ceasefire following US-mediated talks held in Washington, D.C., in an effort to reduce escalating tensions along the border. Under the agreement, Hezbollah is expected to completely halt military operations, while Lebanese armed forces will gradually take exclusive control of designated “pilot zones” in southern Lebanon. The deal marks the fourth round of direct diplomatic talks between Israeli and Lebanese representatives since hostilities intensified earlier this year, although Hezbollah was not directly involved in the negotiations.

Despite the announcement, uncertainty remains over the ceasefire’s effectiveness. Cross-border attacks were reported on the same day the agreement was reached, and Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz stated that Israeli military operations in Lebanon would continue for the time being. He also indicated that Israeli forces would not immediately withdraw from their current positions and would retain the ability to carry out strikes against what Israel considers security threats. Lebanese authorities have meanwhile advised displaced residents not to return to southern areas due to ongoing security concerns and the presence of unexploded ordnance.

Regional leaders and analysts have expressed mixed reactions to the development. Lebanese President Joseph Aoun described the negotiations as a crucial opportunity to achieve a lasting peace, warning that all sides bear responsibility for ensuring the agreement succeeds. Meanwhile, Iranian officials have linked the situation in Lebanon to the broader regional conflict and called for Israel’s withdrawal from occupied positions. Observers note that the absence of Hezbollah from the talks raises questions about implementation, while continued military activity on the ground highlights the fragile nature of the ceasefire and the challenges facing any long-term settlement.