Centre Open to Debate on Operation Sindoor, Trump’s Claim as Stormy Monsoon Session Looms

Union Minister Kiren Rijiju announced that the government is prepared to discuss key national issues, including the controversial Operation Sindoor, during the monsoon session of Parliament beginning Monday. Speaking at an all-party meeting on Sunday, Rijiju emphasized the importance of cooperation between the government and the Opposition to ensure a productive and debate-focused session. He confirmed that the Centre will address the growing controversy surrounding former US President Donald Trump’s recent claim of mediating a ceasefire between India and Pakistan, a statement that has triggered political outrage. Rijiju also noted that the motion to remove Justice Varma has gained momentum, having secured over 100 supporting signatures from lawmakers.

The Opposition has signaled its intent to corner the government on a range of contentious matters, including the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar—dubbed a “poll scam” by critics—and the recent terror attack in Pahalgam that resulted in multiple fatalities. Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi demanded a statement from Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Trump’s alleged mediation and accountability for lapses in national security. AAP MP Sanjay Singh joined the chorus, citing Trump’s repeated remarks and alleged irregularities in the voter roll revision process. These issues are expected to dominate proceedings as the Opposition prepares to put the government on the defensive during the session.

Union Minister JP Nadda, who chaired the all-party meeting along with Rijiju and MoS Arjun Ram Meghwal, reiterated the government’s openness to a structured and comprehensive debate. Leaders from several parties, including Congress, DMK, NCP (Sharad Pawar faction), and RPI (A), were in attendance. With rising public scrutiny and pressure from across the political spectrum, the session is poised to be one of the most combative in recent memory. While the government expresses willingness to engage in dialogue, the real test will lie in navigating political hostilities without derailing legislative priorities.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *